Wednesday, February 13, 2008

Wednesday Morning Update (Another Winter Event ?)

Wow, that was kind of a neat snowfall this morning - and yes flurries were expected but that was a little more than just flurries. Anywhere from 1/2 to locally 1 inch of snow came down with that burst this morning.... you're right - not a huge amount but certainly more than what I was expecting !! Occasional flurries and light snow showers will continue into afternoon as temperatures in the cloud layer are anywhere from -12 to -15C (i.e. good ice crystal generation layer).
Now the next system... ALL models have an arctic boundary moving south through the region on Friday. What happens after frontal passage is where the models diverge. The NAM sets up a decent overrunning event for our area Late Friday into Friday night and spits out a decent amount of snow over us (another 3 to 6 inches !!). The GFS is more reserved and only has a brief period of light snow and flurries with the front. So which one is correct ??? Great question !! It looks to me that the NAM is way overdone on its snow amounts for the region and we'll see an event more like the GFS is painting. What scares me is the NAM absolutely nailed this last winter event - was the first to indicate snow and ice here - and stayed consistant. So, it does seems to have a good handle on the current pattern.
But my problem with the NAM is simply this, after the arctic boundary passes through, why are we getting such good overrunning occurring? I realize that there is an upper H5 low spinning off to our west but that is way off to our west - in New Mexico / W. Texas West !! As a matter of fact, there's even ridging occurring at H5 & H7 across the lower/mid Mississippi valley Friday evening. That does not support a good LLJ setup for our region. So where's all the moisture coming from ??? That's a major concern to me with the NAM solution. It does appear we'll have some lift across the region - mainly due to the RRQ of the upper jet across the Great Lakes. But again .. NO good moisture transport into the region. So the bottom line I'm leaning more towards the GFS on this one - which does have support from various other models as it seems the NAM is the outlyer here and its QPF output does not really match up with what the dynamics are saying.






























At this time, I'd have to say sprinkles/patchy light rain changing to a little light snow/flurries for the Friday / Friday night event with little or no accumulations. That's the way I see it right now anyway...
Thoughts.......??????

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Didn't get to read the post till today...

It's almost like the H3 polar jet is doing a bounce pass with the energy. Wanting to cut it off completely then picking it back up again over the weekend. Too bad it doesn't equate into a slam dunk of more snow... :-)

Given that a surface low develops later now, it appears temps will be warm enough to be mainly a rain event over the weekend with hopes of some leftover moisture turning over to flurries/snow as the arctic air rushes in on Sunday night into Monday...

Those pesky cut offs!

Jay Cardosi said...

Yep, I agree... and now if you notice, the vort max is progged to come out farther west as we get closer to the Sunday event. Different storm same ole' pattern.
I don't think we'll get into any decent wrap around snow... def zone developing WAY to our northwest and moving northeastly. I did like the set up for Monday though - not that we will see any big snowfall but - it may be one of those days where we get "flurried and snow showered to death"... check out the H9 through H8 temps !! nearing -14 to -16C and saturated as we get on the cyclonic side of the upper jet. Good dentrite growth area... should translate into those big-o flakes floating down pretty much all day - if those temps verify. thanks for the note my friend...

Jay